What is balancing false positives and false negatives?

Definition

Balancing between false negative and false positive errors is the process of calibrating classification or detection systems to manage the trade-off between two types of errors:

  • False positive (FP) - incorrectly identifying an element as positive (e.g. masking a region with no personal data).
  • False negative (FN) - failing to identify a true positive element (e.g. missing a face that should be anonymized).

In visual data anonymization, this balancing aims to minimize privacy risk while maintaining high utility and data quality.

Importance in anonymization processes

In AI-supported anonymization systems:

  • False negatives pose legal and ethical risks - potential data breaches and GDPR violations.
  • False positives degrade media quality - unnecessary blurring reduces usefulness and interpretability.

Proper balancing supports compliance with the principles of data minimization and proportionality.

Balancing methods

Method

Description

Use case

Threshold tuning

Adjust detection confidence thresholds

Lower threshold to reduce FN in face blurring

Balanced metrics

Use F1-score, balanced accuracy, MCC

F1-score balances precision and recall

Cross-validation / A/B testing

Evaluate multiple model configurations

Optimize blur accuracy in test environments

Model ensembling

Combine outputs of multiple models

Reduce FN without increasing FP

Rule-based postprocessing

Add deterministic logic to AI output

Catch faces missed by neural model

Risk-based error prioritization

Choose lesser-risk error based on context

In livestreams: FP preferred over FN

Consequences of poor balancing

Error type

Risk level

Possible consequences

False negative

High

Privacy breach, GDPR penalty, reputational damage

False positive

Medium

Over-masking, reduced utility, loss of content quality

Additional consequences may include:

  • Inadmissibility of visual evidence.
  • Misinterpretation in training, teaching, or operations.
  • Increased cost due to manual reprocessing.

Example use cases

  • City surveillance face blurring systems - adaptive thresholding based on lighting and crowd density.
  • Livestream anonymization - error calibration to prevent any face exposure.
  • Ground truth dataset training - error logging and annotation to refine AI behavior.
  • Hybrid validation pipelines - combining AI output with manual review for compliance.

Normative and technical references

  • GDPR (EU 2016/679) - Articles 25 and 32 (privacy by design, processing security).
  • ISO/IEC 22989:2022 - Artificial intelligence - concepts and terminology.
  • ISO/IEC 24029-1:2021 - Robustness assessment of neural networks.
  • EDPB Guidelines 3/2019 - On video surveillance and data protection.