Image Rights and Copyright: Legal Protection for Visual Identity

Łukasz Bonczol
5/23/2025

Understanding image rights and copyright protection has become essential in our increasingly visual digital landscape. Whether you're a photographer, media professional, or someone managing digital content, knowing when and how to use images legally can save you from significant legal consequences. The intersection of copyright, personality rights, and image usage rights creates a complex legal framework that requires careful navigation.

As a Data Protection and Privacy Expert, I frequently encounter cases where organizations face penalties for improper use of images. These range from unauthorized commercial use of someone's likeness to publishing photographs without proper consent under GDPR requirements. The legal and financial implications can be substantial, with damages potentially reaching thousands of euros per violation.

This comprehensive guide will clarify your obligations under copyright laws and the GDPR when using images, helping you avoid infringement while respecting both intellectual property and personal rights. Let's explore the essential aspects of image rights protection and practical compliance strategies.

Futuristic digital interface with binary code, globe, and hexagonal icons including cloud, hourglass, and graph, in grayscale.

What are image rights and why do they matter?

Image rights encompass the legal protections governing how photographs or videos featuring individuals can be used. These rights sit at the intersection of copyright (protecting the creator's work) and personality rights (protecting the subject's likeness). When you take a photograph, you generally own the copyright, but this doesn't automatically grant you unlimited usage rights for commercial purposes.

For media organizations, photographers, and content creators, understanding image rights is crucial for legal compliance. Using someone's image without permission, particularly for commercial gain, can lead to infringement claims and significant legal consequences. The GDPR has further strengthened these protections by classifying photographs of identifiable individuals as personal data.

The importance of proper rights management cannot be overstated, as it protects both the creator's intellectual property and the subject's control over how their likeness is used in public.

Person in a suit using a laptop with a blank screen at a desk, next to a smartphone, pencil holder, and empty photo frame.

What types of rights exist for images?

Several types of rights coexist when it comes to images. First, copyright automatically protects original work created by photographers or artists, giving them exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and display the image. Copyright holders maintain these rights for decades after creation, depending on local legislation.

Second, personality rights (also called publicity rights) protect individuals from unauthorized commercial use of their identity, including their likeness captured in photographs. These personal rights give subjects the right to control the commercial use of their image.

Third, commercial rights determine how an image can be monetized or used in business contexts. A licensing agreement often governs these rights, specifying terms of use and any limitations. Finally, digital rights management systems help enforce these protections across social media platforms and online environments.

Person with tattoos holding a camera with a flash, wearing a plaid shirt, against a plain background.

Using images legally requires understanding several pathways to proper authorization. The most straightforward approach is to obtain permission directly from the copyright holders. This might involve negotiating image usage terms or purchasing appropriate licenses.

Another option is using content from the public domain, where copyright protection has expired or been waived. Resources like Creative Commons (a nonprofit organization that facilitates sharing creative works) offer images with clear usage rights, though you should always verify the specific license terms.

Stock image services like Getty Images provide legally-cleared photographs for specific uses, though these typically require payment and adherence to their licensing terms. For social platforms usage, always review the platform's terms regarding image sharing and republication rights.

In some limited cases, use of a copyrighted work may be considered fair use (for purposes like news reporting, commentary, or education), but this exception is narrowly interpreted and varies by jurisdiction.

Scrabble tiles arranged to spell "ONE TO ONE" on a white background.

When is permission required to use someone's image?

Permission is generally required when you use someone else's image for commercial purposes. Commercial use encompasses advertising, merchandising, or any application where the image helps generate revenue. Using an image to promote products or services without authorization can infringe on both copyright and personality rights.

Under the GDPR, publishing photographs of identifiable individuals typically requires consent, as these constitute personal data. This is particularly strict for vulnerable groups like children. However, there are exceptions for public figures in public places when the photography relates to their public role.

The right to privacy must be balanced against other considerations, such as freedom of expression or public interest. News reporting often benefits from certain exemptions, but these don't eliminate all obligations under image rights law.

A grayscale portrait of a person with a blurred face, wearing a collared shirt and sweater, set against a plain background.

Copyright infringement occurs when you use a protected image without permission in a way that violates the exclusive rights of the copyright holder. This includes reproducing, distributing, or displaying the image without authorization. Even modifying someone else's work can infringe if the result substantially resembles the original work.

Using images found through image search engines without verifying their copyright status is a common way people unknowingly infringe. The fact that an image appears in search results doesn't mean it's free to use. Similarly, the commercial nature of your use significantly impacts whether an action constitutes infringement.

Remember that you can still own the copyright to your photographs while respecting the personality rights of your subjects - these are separate but related legal concepts.

Person holding a blank tablet screen in a cafe setting, with a blurred background and a coffee cup on the table in the foreground.

How does the GDPR affect image rights management?

The GDPR has transformed how organizations must handle images of identifiable individuals. Since photographs can constitute personal data, their processing must comply with GDPR principles, including having a lawful basis for processing (such as consent or legitimate interest).

For photographs taken at events or in public places, you must inform subjects about how their images will be used. This is typically accomplished through privacy notices or visible signage. When the use is of a commercial nature, explicit consent is generally required.

The GDPR gives individuals certain rights regarding image use, including the right to object to processing and, in many circumstances, the right to be forgotten (having their images removed from publications). Media organizations should have clear procedures for handling such requests in their rights management systems.

Failure to comply with these requirements can result in significant penalties under the GDPR's enforcement provisions. Check out Gallio Pro for tools that help ensure GDPR compliance when managing visual content.

White camera icon painted on dark, textured tiles, forming a grid pattern. Black and white image.

Face blurring becomes necessary in several scenarios to protect individuals' privacy and comply with legal requirements. Victims of crimes must have their identities protected in most jurisdictions, requiring media outlets to anonymize their likeness in any published materials.

Minors generally receive enhanced protection, necessitating face blurring unless specific parental consent has been obtained. Bystanders captured incidentally in photographs taken in a public place may need to be anonymized if they're not the intended subject and haven't consented to publication.

In sensitive contexts like medical facilities or during protests where identification could lead to harm, ethical and legal considerations often require anonymization. The legal protection afforded to subjects varies by jurisdiction, but the GDPR sets a high standard for protecting identifiable individuals in visual media.

When in doubt about whether face blurring is required, it's advisable to err on the side of caution or contact us for professional guidance.

3D metallic copyright symbol on a dark background, casting a subtle shadow, with a sleek and modern design.

Social media platforms significantly impact image copyright through their terms of use, which users accept when joining. While you still own the copyright to images you create and upload, these platforms typically receive a broad license to use, modify, and sometimes sublicense your content.

This complex arrangement can create confusion about rights management, as images can spread rapidly across multiple platforms. When looking for images to use commercially, never assume content found on social media is free from copyright protection - the original creator still maintains their rights.

Platforms like Instagram and Facebook have developed tools to help copyright holders report infringement, but prevention remains better than remedy. Always verify the copyright status before sharing or repurposing images found online.

For businesses engaged in influencer marketing, ensure proper agreements address both the influencer's copyright and the rights to use images featuring the influencer's likeness for promotional purposes.

Floating 3D social media icons in grayscale, including a heart, at symbol, and play button, in front of an open laptop on a white surface.

What are the consequences of image rights infringement?

The consequences of infringing on image rights can be severe and multifaceted. Legal penalties may include statutory damages under the copyright act, which can range from hundreds to thousands of euros per infringement. Courts may also order the removal of the infringing content and payment of the plaintiff's legal fees.

Beyond financial penalties, reputational damage can significantly impact organizations that misuse images. Public perception of disrespect for intellectual property protection or privacy rights can harm brand value far beyond any monetary judgment.

Under the GDPR, unauthorized use of someone's image can trigger data protection penalties up to €20 million or 4% of annual global turnover. These regulatory consequences add another layer of risk for organizations that fail to properly manage image rights.

To avoid these outcomes, invest in proper training, clear policies, and robust systems for tracking image permissions. Download a demo of solutions that can help streamline this process.

Person in plaid shirt holding a camera, sitting by a computer displaying architectural plans. Face is blurred. Black and white image.

How can I protect my own image rights as a photographer?

As a photographer, protecting your image rights begins with understanding that you automatically own the copyright to images you create, even without registration. However, registering with your national copyright office provides additional legal protections and remedies in case of infringement.

Clear contracts and licenses are essential when sharing your work. Specify exactly how your copyrighted work to the public can be used, for how long, and in what contexts. Different licenses can be created for different uses, from personal to commercial applications.

Digital watermarks and metadata help identify your work and can serve as a deterrent to unauthorized use. Regular monitoring through reverse image search tools can help detect potential infringement. When you find your work used without permission, a graduated response starting with a takedown request is often most effective.

Remember that while you own the copyright to your photographs, you may still need permission from subjects for certain uses, particularly commercial ones that leverage their likeness.

Person holding a Sony camera with a large lens, wearing a dark coat, standing outdoors in a foggy setting.

What special considerations apply for public figures and celebrities?

Public figures and celebrities operate under somewhat different rules regarding image rights. While they maintain protection against unauthorized commercial use of their likeness for merchandising or endorsements, their right to privacy is more limited in public contexts related to their public role.

News reporting about public figures is generally permitted without specific permission, provided the images relate to matters of public interest and don't diminish the value of the original work. However, using a celebrity's image for commercial purposes without authorization can still infringe on their publicity rights.

Trademark law may provide additional protection when a celebrity's likeness has become distinctive enough to function as a brand identifier. This creates another layer of legal protection beyond standard image rights.

Organizations working with celebrity images should be particularly cautious, as the commercial gain from unauthorized use can lead to enhanced damages in infringement cases.

A vintage typewriter with a sheet of paper displaying the text "COPYRIGHT CLAIM" in bold letters.

FAQ: Common Questions About Image Rights

  1. Do I need permission to share images on my personal social media?While personal sharing typically poses lower risk, you should still respect copyright. Using others' creative work without permission may technically infringe, even on personal accounts.
  2. Can I use images found on Google Images for my business website?No. Images appearing in search results are not free to use. You must verify copyright status and obtain proper permission or licensing for commercial applications.
  3. What's the difference between copyright and personality rights?Copyright protects the creator's rights to their creative work, while personality rights protect an individual's control over commercial use of their likeness, name, or identity.
  4. Do I need model releases for street photography?For artistic or editorial use, generally no. For commercial use where specific individuals are identifiable, yes. GDPR requirements may also apply in Europe.
  5. Can I photograph people at public events without consent?Generally yes for editorial purposes, but commercial use requires permission. Under GDPR, you should provide notice that photography is taking place and how images will be used.
  6. How long does copyright protection last for photographs?In most countries, copyright lasts for the creator's lifetime plus 70 years, after which the work enters the public domain.

What constitutes "fair use" for images?Fair use typically covers criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, and research, but is judged case-by-case based on purpose, nature, amount used, and market effect.

3D white question mark standing on a gray surface, casting a shadow on a wall.

Navigating image rights doesn't have to be overwhelming. With proper understanding and systems in place, you can respect copyright, personality rights, and data protection requirements while still effectively using visual content. Contact us today to learn how our solutions can help streamline your image rights management process.

References list

  1. European Union. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Regulation (EU) 2016/679. European Court of Justice. Case C-345/17 Buivids v. Datu valsts inspekcija (2019), regarding photography and GDPR application. World Intellectual Property Organization. (1996). WIPO Copyright Treaty. Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1886, last amended 1979). United States Copyright Office. (2021). Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices, Third Edition. European Union Intellectual Property Office. (2020). Copyright and Related Rights in the EU. Article 29 Working Party. (2007). Opinion 4/2007 on the concept of personal data.